Human Urine Recycling Promotes Agricultural Sustainability

Bacterial communities in soil are as resilient to human urine as synthetic fertilizers – making recycling the bodily fluid as a fertilizer for agricultural crops a viable proposition, according to a new study.

Scientists discovered that, even when applied in high doses, one-year stored urine had little impact on soil bacterial communities and produced minimal change in soil pH and salinity.

However, the researchers did discover that urine fertilization increased the relative amounts of nitrifying and denitrifying groups compared to synthetic fertilizer - implying that more nitrogen oxides could be emitted when fertilizing with urine.

Publishing their findings in Applied Soil Ecology, the team of researchers from University of Birmingham and L'Institut Agro Montpellier, France, call for further studies on the long-term effects of urine fertilization - particularly regarding nitrogen oxide production and soil salinity.

Our research highlights the potential of recycling human urine to enhance agricultural sustainability, reduce wastewater pollution, and decrease reliance on synthetic fertilizers. Stored urine can be safely applied to a plant-soil system without negatively impacting the soil microbiome."

Manon Rumeau, Co-Author from the University of Birmingham

Fresh urine is composed of 95 % water with the remaining 5% made up of amino compounds, such as urea or creatinine, organic anions and inorganic salts making it a source of bioavailable nutrients and micronutrients for plant growth.

There has been great interest in re-using human urine as a crop fertilizer, but – until the publication of this study - more understanding was required on how urine can affect soil functions and microbial communities.

Scientists fertilized a spinach crop with two different doses of a source-separated and stored human urine –comparing these with a synthetic fertilizer treatment and a water treatment without fertilization, conducted across four soil tanks in greenhouse conditions.

After 12 months of storage, urine had a depleted microbiome but contained few common strains of urine. Thud storing urine for several months, with the resulting increase in its pH value (about 9 rather than 6.5 for fresh urine) and its free ammonia concentration is considered sufficient to inactivate most human pathogenic bacteria and break down extracellular DNA. Soil bacterial communities were resistant to urine fertilization with only 3% of groups of organisms impacted. The urine's high salt concentration had little discernible effect on the bacterial community.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of AZoLifeSciences.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Enterococcus Co-Infection Increases Protective Slime in Pathogenic E. coli