New Guidelines for Accurate Spike-In Normalization in DNA-Protein Interaction Studies

New criteria developed by researchers at the University of California San Diego may greatly enhance the accuracy of results obtained by scientists when assessing the interactions between proteins and DNA. Comprehending these interplays is imperative for understanding human biology in its entirety, and it can also facilitate the creation of novel therapies for an extensive array of ailments, including numerous malignancies.

Spike-in normalization is a popular molecular biology approach that helps guarantee precise and dependable results. Spike-in normalization lets researchers adjust for differences between many samples being compared to one another by introducing a known quantity of chromatin (DNA and the accompanying proteins) to a sample before it is examined.

When comparing two circumstances, such as the effects of a medicine (treated vs. untreated) or a mutation or deletion in a critical gene (normal vs. mutant), spike-in normalization is especially helpful.

By looking through publicly available datasets that use spike-in normalization, the researchers identified common scenarios where spike-in normalization is easily misused and where incorporating additional quality control measures and other “guardrails” into the technique could improve results or prevent misinterpretation.

Through a reanalysis of this data and further research, the team was able to formulate a set of nine essential guidelines for researchers utilizing spike-in normalization, which might significantly improve the precision of their findings. These precautions include following uniform quality control procedures, adhering to computational analysis best practices, and cross-checking the outcomes using alternative analysis methods.

Many studies utilize spike-in normalization, and our results call the biological conclusions drawn from this approach into question. Our recommendations can help account for some of the pitfalls of spike-in normalization so we can still reap the benefits of this valuable technique.”

Alon Goren, Ph.D., Study Senior Author, University of California San Diego

The study was published in the journal Nature Biotechnology.

Source:
Journal reference:

Patel, L. A., et al. (2024) The Wild West of spike-in normalization. Nature Biotechnology. doi.org/10.1038/s41587-024-02377-y.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of AZoLifeSciences.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Automated DNA Separation for Sexual Assault Cases: A Breakthrough in On-Site Forensic Analysis