Genetic burden of retrogene mutations is greater than originally believed

According to a new study performed by researchers from the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology in Plön, Germany, and the Chinese Academy of Sciences in Beijing, the possible genetic burden of mutations emerging from retrogenes is considerably greater than originally believed.

Genetic burden of retrogene mutations is greater than originally believed
Retrogene function. Image Credit: MPI f. Evolutionary Biology.

Genetic data is preserved in DNA and is transcribed as mRNA. Normally, mRNA is translated into proteins. But scientists have known for a long time that mRNA could also be transcribed back to DNA and re-inserted into the genome. These cases are known as retrogenes.

In a new article, researchers from the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology in Plön and the Zoological Institute of the Chinese Academy of Sciences in Beijing have reported that this process was earlier underestimated by a minimum factor of 1000, and that it is a significant new mutation mechanism.

There are two major explanations for that. Firstly, the common search algorithms employed in genome sequence analysis do not typically consider new insertions of retrogenes. Hence, these insertions continue to remain concealed in the large mass of data. And these insertions can only be systematically discovered using an optimized algorithm, such as the one designed by the researchers.

Secondly, the study authors demonstrated that a majority of the insertions are comparatively short-lived. Moreover, these insertions seem to be relatively rare in earlier genome comparisons between organisms.

Mutation by retrogenes is usually harmful

In the new research work, it was, therefore, important to explore populations that have developed only recently. The investigators observed that populations of mice that have been isolated for just around 3000 years bear different retrogenes, that is, in each population, retrogenes evolve at a very high rate but are gain lost again relatively rather quickly.

The reason for this is that retrogenes can be dangerous—even if they are embedded into non-coding DNA. If retrogenes are re-transcribed into mRNA (as is the case for the majority of them), this novel mRNA can adversely impact the mRNA of the gene from which they evolved. As a consequence, the retrogene functions as a regulatory mutant, which is generally negative.

The researchers have demonstrated that the genetic burden of this process is greater than that of point mutations, which so far have been the main focus of analyses. The team has therefore proposed that the retrogene mechanism should also be taken into account in the quest for disease-causing mutations.

Source:
Journal reference:

Zhang, W., et al. (2020) The mutational load in natural populations is significantly affected by high primary rates of retroposition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2013043118.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of AZoLifeSciences.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
A New Statistical Method to Mitigate AI Bias in Genetic Research