Sylph: A Fast and Accurate Tool for Species-Level Metagenome Profiling

Shotgun metagenomics has revolutionized the study of microbial communities by enabling direct sequencing of all genomes within a sample, bypassing the need for culturing. Traditional profiling methods, however, struggle with accuracy and efficiency, especially for low-abundance organisms and high-complexity metagenomes.

In a recent study published in Nature Biotechnology, University of Toronto researchers introduced sylph — a novel metagenome profiling tool designed to improve species-level accuracy and computational efficiency.

The researchers used multiple datasets to demonstrate the faster, more precise profiling provided by sylph while addressing the issues faced by traditional methods, highlighting its suitability in diverse metagenomic applications.

Person working in a lab​​​​​​​Study: Rapid species-level metagenome profiling and containment estimation with sylph. Image Credit: Matej Kastelic/Shutterstock.com

Background

Metagenomics has become an essential tool for exploring microbial diversity, allowing researchers to profile microbial communities directly from environmental samples.

Traditional methods typically rely on either genome assembly or reference-based profiling, each with limitations. Assembly-based approaches are effective for discovering novel genomes but often fail for low-abundance organisms due to inadequate data coverage.

Reference-based profiling is more efficient, leveraging vast microbial genome databases to detect organisms even at low abundance.

However, these methods can suffer from inaccuracies and high false-positive rates, especially when based on short-read matches or specific marker genes. Additionally, existing methods also struggle to handle the massive size and complexity of metagenomic datasets.

The Current Study

In the present study, researchers developed and tested the species-level metagenome profiler sylph, which uses a novel statistical model to address biases in genome similarity estimation for low-coverage metagenomes.

Sylph’s method used k-mers (k is the number of nucleotides), which are short deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) sequences that are used for computational analysis of genome sequences.

The profiler begins by subsampling k-mers (k = 31) from each genome in a reference database or metagenomic sample, forming a compact k-mer sketch, which is a small subset of a sequence that is created by sampling k-mers from a sequence for reducing the dimensionality of a sequence.

The containment of these sketches within metagenomic samples is then assessed to estimate genome-to-metagenome similarity. Sylph applies a zero-inflated Poisson model, where zero inflation accounts for divergent k-mers with no coverage.

In this study, the model inferred effective coverage for each reference genome, which enabled the researchers to make an accurate adjustment of the average nucleotide identity (ANI) estimates.

Sylph was tested on synthetic and real datasets to evaluate its precision and efficiency. A multi-sample environment was used to simulate complex communities, which were used to assess the accuracy of sylph in identifying species and the computational resources needed.

Furthermore, comparisons with other popular profilers, including Kraken2, mOTUs3, Bracken, K-mer-based Metagenomic Classification and Profiling (KMCP), and MetaPhlAn4, were also conducted based on metrics such as precision, sensitivity, computational performance, and the F1 score, which measures a machine learning model's accuracy.

The researchers also assessed the practical applications of sylph by benchmarking real metagenomic samples, including human gut microbiomes, synthetic datasets, and strain-specific disease associations.

Major Findings

The study found that sylph provided a highly accurate and efficient approach to species-level metagenome profiling and was able to estimate genome-to-metagenome containment ANI using low computational resources and less memory than traditional methods.

This novel profiler also accurately detected microbial taxa with higher precision across various synthetic and real metagenomic datasets. Sylph’s ANI-based profiling maintained a precision level greater than 90% across different ANI levels, proving particularly robust in detecting low-abundance organisms.

Additionally, sylph was found to be 50 times faster than the next-fastest method, Kraken2, while consuming 30-fold lower memory, which was especially advantageous in multi-sample profiling tasks.

Furthermore, sylph performed exceptionally well on synthetic datasets where organisms lacked species-level representatives in the database, achieving up to 92% mean precision and 82% F1 score for species-level classification, outperforming the other tested profilers.

In a real sample test on human gut microbiomes, sylph demonstrated high sensitivity and precision, detecting more species and achieving more accurate abundance estimates than other profilers such as MetaPhlAn4 and mOTUs3.

The researchers also demonstrated the versatility of sylph by applying it to disease association studies, where the ANI-based profiling identified strain-level correlations in a large Parkinson’s disease cohort.

Using ANI as a covariate, sylph confirmed known associations between short-chain fatty acid-producing strains and protective effects against Parkinson’s disease. These findings highlighted the effectiveness of sylph in high-throughput, low-abundance genome detection.

Furthermore, sylph successfully detected higher percentages of viral sequences in human gut samples compared to the standard RefSeq database in less than a minute while using significantly lower memory, demonstrating substantial comprehensiveness for profiling viruses and bacteria.

Conclusions

Overall, the study highlighted the utility of this novel metagenome profiler in diverse applications. It provides rapid, accurate species-level profiles that significantly improve speed and sensitivity compared to conventional methods.

The findings demonstrated that sylph is well-suited for large-scale metagenomic studies, with faster processing times and minimal memory requirements. This advances our ability to analyze microbial diversity accurately and uncover strain-level disease associations across various ecosystems.

Journal reference:

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Sidharthan, Chinta. (2024, November 21). Sylph: A Fast and Accurate Tool for Species-Level Metagenome Profiling. AZoLifeSciences. Retrieved on December 24, 2024 from https://www.azolifesciences.com/news/20241121/Sylph-A-Fast-and-Accurate-Tool-for-Species-Level-Metagenome-Profiling.aspx.

  • MLA

    Sidharthan, Chinta. "Sylph: A Fast and Accurate Tool for Species-Level Metagenome Profiling". AZoLifeSciences. 24 December 2024. <https://www.azolifesciences.com/news/20241121/Sylph-A-Fast-and-Accurate-Tool-for-Species-Level-Metagenome-Profiling.aspx>.

  • Chicago

    Sidharthan, Chinta. "Sylph: A Fast and Accurate Tool for Species-Level Metagenome Profiling". AZoLifeSciences. https://www.azolifesciences.com/news/20241121/Sylph-A-Fast-and-Accurate-Tool-for-Species-Level-Metagenome-Profiling.aspx. (accessed December 24, 2024).

  • Harvard

    Sidharthan, Chinta. 2024. Sylph: A Fast and Accurate Tool for Species-Level Metagenome Profiling. AZoLifeSciences, viewed 24 December 2024, https://www.azolifesciences.com/news/20241121/Sylph-A-Fast-and-Accurate-Tool-for-Species-Level-Metagenome-Profiling.aspx.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of AZoLifeSciences.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Single-Cell Sequencing Sheds Light on Breast Cancer Genetics